• 1.800.734.5351
  • Schedule a Pick Up - 1.800.734.5351 Ext 5

Reshoring Optimism, But Not Much Else

reshoring optimism

Editor's Note: This is a guest blog which tackles the hard numbers behind reshoring. Although, long term, reshoring makes sense for some, at the end of the day, what reshoring does is remind executives at manufacturing companies to look at the long term, then decide what is best for the company. That may mean reshoring eventually, but according to today's guest post, we also must look at the hard data before we decree that reshoring is in full form yet. 

Editor's Edit: As promised, we wanted to include the accompanying report to this article. It is now out from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, titled The Myth of America’s Manufacturing Renaissance: The Real State of U.S. Manufacturing.

Reshoring Optimism Abound, However, Let's Look at the Data Now

You’ve probably heard the good news. After a decade of being constantly bombarded with news of off-shoring, images of deserted factories, and heart-wrenching tales of laid-off American workers unable to find new employment now that their job is in China, jobs are streaming back into the country, factories are reopening, and we’re back to whistling while we work. We’ve even got a new word for the phenomenon- reshoring.

Just don’t look at actual data. Because funny enough, the numbers illustrate that reshoring is a myth.

True, off-shoring has slowed and has maybe even stabilized. But this respite does not mean that manufacturing jobs are reappearing. Yes, there are isolated instances which your local paper can emphatically cite. However, there is no evidence that America’s manufacturing woes have magically worked themselves out, or that a significant number of jobs that left for China and Mexico are being shipped back.

The truth is that even since the recession, more manufacturing firms have been lost than created in the United States. Manufacturing establishments (the number of factories or manufacturing sites), have followed the same trend. In 2011, the United States was home to 10 percent fewer manufacturing firms and manufacturing establishments than in 2008. In fact, in 2011 the United States had the fewest manufacturing firms and manufacturing establishments since the Census Bureau began collecting Business Dynamics data in 1977 (when, it should be mentioned, the U.S. labor force was 35 percent smaller than it is today).

Admittedly, this data is only current through 2011, but manufacturing employment data tells a similar story. While the economy has added some jobs since its nadir in 2009, labor statistics show that employment growth since 2010 has matched, not outpaced, growth of the labor force. Yes, manufacturing jobs are up by 700,000 since 2010, but there are still over 1 million fewer manufacturing jobs than there were in 2008. Predominantly, recovered jobs result from factories returning to full production capacity as aggregate demand recovers, not from new manufacturing projects flocking to our shores.

manufacturing employment

Even articles brashly proclaiming the return of the manufacturing sector sheepishly admit that the number of firms they have actually seen reshore is under 100, many of which are small or mid-sized, or that job fluctuations due to offshoring and reshoring is about neutral. None of the articles back reshoring claims with real employment data, nor have more recently updated macroeconomic indicators pointed to a major reversal in the United States’ manufacturing fortunes.

Clearly, such articles represent cherry-picked case studies, not a national trend. Isolated examples are widely repeated because of public desire for good economic news as well as firms’ desire to improve public image by loudly publicizing their relocation.

With no serious changes or improvements to support for our manufacturing sector, the respite in rapid offshoring derives from the temporarily depressed value of the dollar and U.S. wages following the recession. Additionally, offshoring is slowing because most of the factories which could leave already have.

Manufacturing is not dead in this country, but neither is it experiencing a sudden renaissance. The sad reality is that the vast majority of departed jobs are not coming back. To recoup lost manufacturing strength, America needs a strong manufacturing strategy to boost research and development, encourage innovation, and ensure the United States remains a leader in advanced, emerging industries. We also need a stronger education system to ensure that the United States has the requisite labor force. Currently, the STEM shortage is an active barrier to U.S. manufacturing- Apple can’t relocate iPhone production to the U.S. because we simply don’t have the small army of 30,000 available engineers needed to man the factories. We need a smarter corporate tax structure to keep American production competitive with other nations. And we need research into robotics, additive manufacturing, and other cutting edge technologies that increase the productivity of workers and could make manufacturing goods in the United States feasible once more.

Reshoring Special Report from ITIF

The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation will soon have a special report on their website next month for download on Reshoring. Make sure you visit and bookmark their website to be one of the first to see the report. We will update this post with the report link once it is available. Have thoughts on Reshoring? Would love your comments below!

Other Posts You Might Like:

Adams Nager
Adams Nager is an economic research analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Areas of interest include international competitiveness, macroeconomic theory, STEM education policy, and high-skilled immigration issues. Prior to ITIF, Adams was a student at Washington University in St. Louis, where he earned an M.A. in Political Economy and Public Policy and a B.A. in Economics and Political Economy.
Adams Nager
  • When you start to see “desparate” posts by people trying to promote offshore manufacturing
    locations you see that the tide is finally tuning. The return of jobs will have to wait until the investment in onshore manufacturing facilities actually occurs

  • Pingback: Changing Face of Manufacturing: US Manufacturers Looking Homeward()

  • We agree that steps need to be taken.

    We appreciate that our founder/president Harry Moser was quoted in the ITIF report, which exemplifies the significance of reshoring.

    We agree that we must not become complacent about the manufacturing renaissance and need a national manufacturing strategy to ensure the continued rebound of U.S. manufacturing.

    An important quote:
    According to Harry Moser, “Essentially, reshoring should be seen as not a measure of the renaissance but the most efficient tool to start achieving it.”

    The challenge is to pick the most effective and implementable actions to overcome the loss of manufacturing and the trade deficit.

    The Reshoring Initiative sees two choices:

    1. In the short to medium term: reshoring – getting companies to understand all of the benefits of local production and adopt a more comprehensive total cost analysis. This could cut the trade deficit by 25% and bring back 1 million manufacturing jobs. Mainly this requires education of companies and is entirely under the control of our society. Detailed, objective reporting is necessary to motivate companies to reevaluate offshoring.

    2. In the longer term, to get the other 75%, requires improved competitiveness: taxes, currency/tariffs, skilled workforce, basic education, etc. All are political, most are cultural and endemic, currency/tariffs is subject to WTO rules, other countries’ actions and our need to raise interest rates. There has been almost no progress on these fronts in decades of trying.

    Ideally, it is best to do both sets of actions.

    We should be enthusiastic about reshoring but not optimistic about the renaissance until we begin to take the steps to allow us in the future to become optimistic about renaissance.

    The Reshoring Initiative Can Help.

    The not-for-profit Reshoring Initiative’s free Total Cost of Ownership software helps corporations calculate the real P&L impact of reshoring or offshoring. In many cases, companies find that, although the production cost is lower offshore, the total cost is higher, making it a good economic decision to reshore manufacturing back to the U.S.

  • Pingback: What is DFMA & How It Help Reduce Supply Chain Costs()

[WHITE PAPER] The Top Supply Chain Trends that Will Impact Supply Chain Management in 2018Download Now

Join 20,000 Plus Subscribers!

To subscribe to our blog, enter your email address below and stay on top of things.



Send this to friend